The Two (Investment) Cultures

Can’t we all just get along?

Teamsters wildcat strike, Minneapolis, 1934. Source: Wikipedia

Fifty-five years ago scientist and novelist C.P. Snow gave a lecture on “The Two Cultures,” bemoaning the gap of understanding between literary intellectuals and scientists—between the humanities and science. At the time, policy-makers worried that many scientists had never read Dickens, and that the Atomic Age would establish a technocratic tyranny, a “Brave New World.” To these people Snow asked, “Can you describe the Second Law of Thermodynamics? Or what is meant by mass and acceleration?” In other words, do you understand basic physics?

Snow was concerned that the ignorance of science by people educated in the humanities would limit the benefits of technological progress. His influence was so great in England that he was offered what amounted to a Cabinet post as Minister of Technology. There was controversy around the idea, but the notion of “two cultures” persists—with much of liberal education trying to bridge this gap.

Investors also experience a cultural divide—between value and growth investing. These two approaches are sometimes caricatured. Value investing has been defined as finding half-smoked cigar butts on the street and taking a drag, or as dumpster diving in the stock market. Growth investing, on other hand has been described as “buy high, and sell higher,” or as momentum investing. Value investors are thought of as painstaking, cautious, and obsessed with a margin of safety, while growth investors are portrayed as fun, go-go trendsetters focused on finding tomorrow’s winners that would be “cheap at any price.” The value/growth dichotomy is reinforced by analysis that divides the market into style-boxes—a matrix of small, mid, and large companies that are value, growth, or blended.

Global Market Update - Battle Strike 1934

Source: Moneyandmarkets.com

Often the two camps criticize one other—citing academic studies and investment gurus to support their respective cases.

But the purpose of investing is to make money, not score debate points. There’s more than one way to skin a catfish, and there are lots of ways to assemble a profitable portfolio. In fact, there are as many different portfolios as there are investors, depending on return requirements, attitudes about risk, time horizon, liquidity needs, and so on. Each investor has a unique financial and psychological profile. Their investments should no more fit into a style box than they themselves fit into personality-box.

Both growth and value styles have their place in money management—just as humanities and science education do in the University. They key in all cases is to keep learning.


Douglas R. Tengdin, CFA
Chief Investment Officer
Phone: 603-224-1350
Leave a comment if you have any questions—I read them all!

Follow me on Twitter @GlobalMarketUpd

www.chartertrust.com • www.moneybasicsradio.com www.globalmarketupdate.net
By | 2017-07-17T12:22:46+00:00 June 1st, 2015|Global Market Update|0 Comments

About the Author:

Mr. Tengdin is the Chief Investment Officer at Charter Trust Company and author of “The Global Market Update”. The audio version of each post can be heard on radio stations throughout New England every weekday. Mr. Tengdin graduated from Dartmouth College, Magna Cum Laude. He received his Master of Arts from Trinity Divinity School, Magna Cum Laude and received his Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation in 1992. Mr. Tengdin has been managing investment portfolios for over 30 years, working for Bank of Boston, State Street Global Advisors, Citibank – Tunisia, and Banknorth Group. Throughout his career, Mr. Tengdin has emphasized helping clients manage their financial risks in difficult environments where they can profit from investing in diverse assets in diverse settings. - Leave a comment if you have any questions—I read them all! - And Follow me on Twitter @GlobalMarketUpd

Leave A Comment